Submit Your Comments
MlHc31

"We trust that you will avoid using harsh language and will refrain from making unsubstantiated allegations against individuals and firms. Your constructive feedback and opinions are very valuable to all of us in the industry. "

Comments Posted
Nikhil Girme ARN NO :39636 PUNE, 22 Aug 2017

I agree with Raj Talati to some extent....Tax outgo has increased un-necessarily due to booking of profts of MFs which could have been routed alternatively to a dynamic asset allocation product Also endowment thing we need to fund out why was it suggested ..Was it a guranteed return product...and why not increase cover of the person instead of locking up money in long term insurance savings

Raj Talati ARN NO :3535 Vadodara, 11 Mar 2016

@Rajesh, 1) I have concern about suggesting endowment plan instead of Term Plan, Endowment plans are very low in returns in the range of 4-5% although they are tax free. 2) As mentioned premium of new insurance was more then earlier life cover that means they are in top bracket. After booking profit/Asset allocation you made them buy a annuity assuming that interest rate will go down, we all know that interest rates move in cycles and there would be a period when interest will again go up. Secondly: you made them invested in a taxable instrument (Annuity)and inturn advised them to divert annuity to again equity funds through SIP, I couldnt understand logic.

Vikaas M Sachdeva ARN NO :Edelweiss AMC Ltd Mumbai, 11 Mar 2016

Very interesting...Perhaps Rajesh should also highlight, at some stage, the brilliant use of technology that he does, to manage his business and service his clients