Submit Your Comments
W74svo

"We trust that you will avoid using harsh language and will refrain from making unsubstantiated allegations against individuals and firms. Your constructive feedback and opinions are very valuable to all of us in the industry. "

Comments Posted
PRABHA MALHOTRA ARN NO :7999 JABALPUR, 30 Jul 2013

MR RASTOGI IS A VETERAN IN HIS CAPACITY, RELIANCE MIP HAS BEEN GIVING CONSISTANT RETURNS A GOOD RECOMMENDATION VIS A VIS BANK FDS

nainesh anantrai pathak ARN NO :40645 surat, 24 Feb 2013

Excellent article thanks

Reliance Mutual Fund Team ARN NO :------ Mumbai, 20 Feb 2013

Dear Mr. Rastogi, thanks for sharing your views and we endorse this completely. This can be ideal for an investor who is not looking at drawing regular income from MIP for consumption purpose and hence is moving a portion to equity systematically through different modes including SWP, STP (Systematic Transfer Plan) or DTP (Dividend Transfer Plan). From operational convenience perspective, both STP & DTP can be exercised in the same AMC with best available schemes. The past simulation suggests that such practise has higher probability of adding alpha to the investor. Thanks again for sharing the views. Reliance Mutual Fund Team

Tapan Paul ARN NO :6396 ISLAMPUR, U/D, 19 Feb 2013

if investment lump sump amount and after 1 year we strat STP till 4-5 years what is the investment idea ?

vishal rastogi ARN NO :51920 patna, 19 Feb 2013

Whats your view if the investor have the view of 5yrs + & willing to have 1% average SWP with some of the best value Stocks MF schemes.(like icici Discovery, Uti DYF, etc)

ASHUTOSH MUKHERJEE ARN NO :ARN-3949 Bhagalpur, 19 Feb 2013

Really it is not explainable how good & useful article for all. Thank you Sir, for such anice article.

Reliance Mutual Fund Team ARN NO :------ Mumbai, 18 Feb 2013

Dear Mr. Ravindra Kumar, we appreciate your points of view. In our view, managing 85% in Debt & 15% in equity seperately & aligning it to different market conditions would work in case of closely advised clients. However if this preposition was to be offered in mass retail, it may find challenge in execution, hence its advisable to have MIP in mass retail that offers auto-alignment of portfolio to different market conditions thereby capturing opportunities in both debt & equity space. Thanks for sharing your views: Reliance Mutual Fund Team

Boodugere Nagaraj ARN NO :5746 Bangalore, 18 Feb 2013

Good, You still have faith in stock market ! All infrastructure shares had capital erossion of about 40 % in last four years, without any return ! Defenite return and safety is there in 5 yr. Bank FDs. Can you give itn writing the same return in 5 yr investment in Equity ? More over why should anybody take that risk and loose his hard earned savings ? What is that extra ordinary benefit the investor is getting ? It is foolish to compare it with Equity/MF.

Reliance Mutual Fund Team ARN NO :------ Mumbai, 18 Feb 2013

Dear Mr. Ramanathan, we appreciate your points of view. In our perspective, the inference we draw from the article above is the length of investment tenure that leads the investment to ride through different market conditions and capture opportunities offered both in debt & equity space. Viewing returns exactly from 5 years perspective may not be advisable as point to point return is not a true indicator of the purpose & potential of the scheme especially in situation if markets levels are low. Its advisable to avoid redeeming funds at such situations & let the phase pass-by. Thanks again for sharing your views: Reliance Mutual Fund Team

Ramanathan ARN NO :48308 Alleppey, 18 Feb 2013

I am not convinced. At the end of five years if the market is at bottom. equity part is not going to perform and returns may be much less than FD.

S.P.SINGH JODHKA ARN NO :ARN-36271 LUDHIANA, 18 Feb 2013

opting STP of 10% from MIP in equity has proved very good over a min period of 5 years .one gets good equity exposure and his capital remains intact.

Anant Dhavale ARN NO :22876 Pune, 18 Feb 2013

Whatever Mr Hemant has explained is correct. In fact good MIPs have doubled the money within seven years and with tax efficiencies i.e. with indexation benefit the tax liability is minimal as compared to TDS on FDs. His suggestion of introducing the new comers with MIP offering to an extent is also appreciable considering the volatile returns even thru SIPs for 3 to 5 years duration.

Vinod Kumar Sharma ARN NO :ARN-58692 Jammu, 18 Feb 2013

Nice Article.

RAVINDRA KUMAR ARN NO :48685 MUZAFFARNAGAR, 18 Feb 2013

I AM NOT FULLY CONVINCED. BETTER IS 85% OF TOTAL INVESTMENT IN DEBT FUND/INCOME FUND, AND REST 15% IN DIVERSIFIED EQUITY FUND. SO GET BETTER LIQUIDITY DURING VOLATILE /FALLING MARKET. ALSO GET TAX FREE RETURN ON EQUITY FUND.

sanjay m naik ARN NO :32868 SANGLI, 18 Feb 2013

MIP CAN BE BEST TOOL FOR TRANSFERING DIV TO DIV EQUITY SCHEMES FOR BETTER POST TAX RETURNS

sunil bhagat ARN NO :9646 pondicherry, 18 Feb 2013

All said and done, I am not very sure this works in a bear mkt or a gloomily volatile scenario. What if these negative periods are reached nearer to the 4th or 5th year. In the bearish phases, I have seen the returns around 5-6% ....

kamal kalra ARN NO :41042 navi mumbai, 18 Feb 2013

thank you hemantji i hope that u keep making us update on knowledge.

gsomasundaram ARN NO :16932 nagercoil, 18 Feb 2013

highly informative

DB DESAI ARN NO :0234 KUDAL, 18 Feb 2013

Happy to see the performance of the scheme with an article about the product. I remember having commented in this column that returns should be included in the presentation/interview for better understanding and co relating. Thanks.